I am an Indian and I want to travel the world, should I start my journey from India or abroad?

Start from India.

• Shouldn't you explore Kashmir

before visiting Switzerland?

• Shouldn't you explore Andaman & Nicobar

 before visiting Mauritius?

• Shouldn't you explore Kutch

before visiting Salar de Uyuni?

• Shouldn't you explore Coorg

before visiting Scotland?

• Shouldn't you explore Goa

Before visiting Thailand?

• Shouldn't you explore Kerala

before visiting Venice?

• Shouldn't you explore Sikkim

before exploring Iceland?

• Shouldn't you explore Hampi

before visiting Bagan?

• Shouldn't you explore the tulip gardens of Srinagar before Netherlands?

• You don’t need to go to the hills of Alaska to ski when you can have it in Auli of Uttarakhand.
  
  

• The allure of Valley of Flowers in Uttarakhand is in the same league as that of Antelope Valley in USA.
  
  

• India Gate in Delhi and Arc de Triomphe in France, do look identical, don’t they?
  
  

• Qutub Minar in Delhi and Leaning Tower of Pisa in Italy.

• The marvelous Jal Mahal in Jaipur and the Trakai Castle of Lithuania.
  
  

• Thar Desert in Jaisalmer and Sahara Desert in Morocco share the same folklores.
  
  

• Chitrakoot Falls in Chhattisgarh and Niagara Falls.
  
  

• India’s very own Big Ben – Rajabai Tower of Mumbai
  
  

• Gandikota Hills in Andhra Pradesh and Grand Canyon.
  
  

• Tea leaves at Munnar in Kerala and Boh Tea Plantation in Malaysia will be equally fragrant.
  
  

Yes, every place has its own charm which can't be replicated or substituted. But as an Indian, it would make little sense to travel to other countries before exploring your own country.

P.S  It was not intended to compare places or to show that one place is at par with another. Even though the motive was to show similarity, some examples fail miserably. The basic idea was to imply that if you are an Indian citizen setting off for world travel, India is the best place to start.